World of Wars Future Sonics m5 vs JVC fxz200

Recently, the last moving iron TF10 finally let go because of the wearing problem... Holding the mentality of entering one, taking advantage of the good impression left by JVC M750 before, holding the heart of eating crabs, 3 moving circles Extraterrestrial Technology FXZ200.

So at this point, all the plugs in the hand are moving, it is estimated that the new plug will not be tossed in a short time, the two hands are enough for a long time, the other is FUTURE SONIC M5 (MG7), these two The plug is estimated that everyone should not be particularly familiar with it. It is not a hot moving circle like IE8 and EXK. From a personal point of view, these two plugs should also be considered high-level in the dynamic circle, although they are different in style, but they are placed in the dynamic circle. There is definitely a strength in the battle. At the same time, I personally think that the strength of the plugs in these two days does not exist in the place where the other flagship plugs are feared. There is also a period of time to enter the forum. Let’s take this opportunity to write a review. The front end H320, the sound source is WAV and 320KB based.

Explain in advance, this article only talks about subjective feelings. If you make a mistake, you should ignore it. The two plugs will be explained first:

M5: Close to 200H, the sound is basically stable, the packaging is very cottage, the used ones know that the paper packaging makes many brothers spit incompetent, the work is also the roadside level, maybe even better than the plug on the burr glue watermark.. The accessories are quite generous, the earphone box works very well, three pairs of two sets, yellow / black sponge sets each four pairs, it is not bad!

200: It didn't take long to start, 50+, in terms of JVC's consistent style, it is definitely not enough. After the stability and then update, I only talk about the quality of the opening. The packaging is relatively small, it seems that the flagship flagship box is not small now, the packaging is still very delicate, open it and look at it... the moment is cool, a small poor earphone box, I miss the TF aluminum box, then the big, medium and small three pairs Silicone, no other sleeves, a wire clamp, a winder, the filter is not metal, it is nylon (should be this)...

Both plugs are not equipped with an extension cord and a 6.5 adapter, which is estimated to be a one-hearted positioning.

M5 double-section is not used to wearing at first, the habit is still quite comfortable, the sponge cover is more pothole, the rough work can not be compared with the C set, the sound is not as good as the double section; but the double section I think the sound insulation is not enough, so I made it myself. Modification, strengthen the sound insulation and comfort, take out the original sponge tube and cut it into the double section. Although there are problems in appearance, the sound insulation is coming up, and it has a certain influence on the sound. Let's talk later; the pickles are very easy to pit. Hard to pay attention to maintenance, although very fine but still skinny, wear around the ear without pressure, the stethoscope effect is general, not too big, personally think that it is better than TF10, the original double section of the sound insulation, the modification is similar to TF10;

200 pickles are very good, not soft, not hard, not knotted, but the splitter is heavier than the heavy headphones, there will be some falling, the official recommendation is wearing, the wearing style will be more exotic than some aliens, around Some of the ear is not very good, but it is better to use the cable ties on the splitter to grow short-term, which is much better. The stethoscope is worn without the wire clamp. The effect is heavy and the impact is worn. The long and short lines are worn without pressure. Can only say that it can be better than the M5 original double section inferior to the modified double section and TF10.

Finally, let's talk about the part of the sound that everyone is most concerned about: the two plugs should say that there are some main low-frequency meanings. This is not to say that the two plugs are low-frequency heads or other frequency bands are not good, but from the general impression, the MG7 has a benchmark. The level of low frequency, and 200 is said to be JVC re-upgraded on the dual unit 90 of the year, plus a subwoofer unit, the headphone splitter also says "LIVE BEAT"; actually listened to, two plugs The low frequency is quite good, but it is by no means a low-frequency thing. I believe everyone knows that the plugs at this price are all balanced according to their own tuning.

Low frequency: Because 200 is not open, let's talk about opening it! MG7 sounds low-frequency, good momentum, full of momentum, but a little bit more rushing, after the pheasant, the low frequency begins to converge, the amount of feeling is less, the quality is better, the dive is deep, if the general dive is to the throat This can feel the feeling of hitting the lungs; the sense of air (should be said) is very good, using He Xundian's dust drum to audition, it really seems to feel the vibration of the drum surface dust, very enjoyable, full of momentum, with Many fans say the same, such high-quality low frequency has no effect on the intermediate frequency, it is quite rare; if you like the low frequency of the head may not feel how good the MG7 low frequency, but like the quality and momentum, it will definitely be touched by the low frequency of MG7 of! The low-frequency feeling of 200 sound is slightly larger than that of MG7, and the dive is slightly inferior to MG7, but it is very fast, so the overall listening feeling may be more suitable for the general popular. Fortunately, the subwoofer unit does not bring The low frequency of the head is estimated to be very powerful. At present, the dust drum is also used for audition. It feels that the low frequency is relatively fat relative to MG7. The momentum and dive are not as good as MG7, but it can feel strong potential, so the MG7 is tentatively stronger than 200.

Mid-range: Although it is not packaged, the mid-range of 200 is quite delicate. Although the intermediate frequency can't just say vocals, it is still more straightforward to comment with vocals. 200 people are very delicate, the emotions are not strong but absolutely there, not thick or thin, a little ear, the male voice is better than the female voice, the sound is a little warm, but not demon, the kind of listening, the saliva is well in place, Say 200 is a vocal weapon exaggeration, but it can definitely meet most of the requirements; MG7's mid-range is very special, like it should be very dislike, should be very annoying, the intermediate frequency is slightly slender, through the front end and the sleeve can have Small improvement, the overall vocals are not too close, the bright and slender, energetic girls are very good, but the mellow vocals will be slightly odorous, and the male voices will also have a sensation of sensation due to the slender lines. The reduction of such vocals should be very distinctive. Whether you like it or not depends on your personal style. From the omnivorous and popular tastes, the 200 IF should be better than the MG7.

High frequency: I don't know if the high frequency will change greatly after 200 packs open or need to be put on. The high frequency of 200 is not bad, but the brightness and extension are not as good as MG7. The high frequency of MG7 is very bright and full of energy. It is brighter than TF10. Some people may think that such a high frequency is a little exciting, but listening to the violin is very cool. This is not enough for the high frequency of 200; but the performance of the piano I think the two plugs are half a catty, although MG7 is brighter, but there is a kind of warmth under 200, so it should be flat;

Analyze the sound field, etc.: 200 is not a dynamic 3 technology, the analysis will not be inferior to any multi-unit moving iron, at least compared with the TF10, W4 I have heard, and personally think that the transient of 200 is very good, the sound field 200 is more regular, the horizontal is larger than MG7, the vertical feeling is half a catty; MG7's analysis is also very good, but it is not a metamorphosis level, the advantage is that people can put more attention on the song itself, the sound field is not horizontal. But it does not feel crowded, but it will give people a very good atmosphere; low noise, MG7 basically does not have this problem, 200 need to pay attention, the machine with unsound sound is easy to produce low noise.

Both are omnivorous plugs, but the MG7 appears to be more V-shaped, and the distribution of the 200 tri-band is more balanced; both are very sloppy plugs, and it is estimated that it takes about 200H to stabilize. At the time, MG7 high frequency has some punctual low frequency and some rushes. 200 sounds are somewhat unnatural. If you prefer instrument performance and low frequency momentum, MG7 may be more suitable. If you prefer omnivorous, vocal, and popular, 200 is a good choice, especially There are activities now; the two plugs are not very good to push the kind, MG7 wants to introduce momentum to require a certain thrust, the thrust is not enough, the low frequency is easy to mix and the high frequency is not bright enough; 200 feels insufficient thrust, the sound is not as bad as MG7 But eat current. It takes a few more to make a sound, and it is not easy to introduce a good look.

Finally, I still have to sigh, the price of the Bank of China is still too pit.